What you Need to Know About the Ruling on Campaign Finance Law
There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.